AUTHOR’S NOTE
If the story feels wrong, that’s normal.
It because it remembers you differently than you remember yourself.
Some readers have said the pages change on rereading.But that’s only because you do.If you start hearing your name in the quiet parts. Don’t Stop.
Keep reading.
It’s safer inside the story than outside it.
I. DIARY– 3:14 AM
The humming again. Three notes.
Soft… unfinished. Like someone trying not to wake the dark.
I sat up quickly, because last time I lost the melody.
But when I wrote it down, the page already had it
Same shape of the letters, same tilt of the g, same slight smudge where my hand must’ve brushed it.
Except I don’t remember writing this before.
The ink was dry.
I check the lock on the door. Still latched from inside.
I don’t lie to myself in this book.
At least, I don’t think I do.
II. CASE NOTE #01– INTERN: K.D. / SUPERVISOR: DR. V. AMRE
Patient displays nocturnal agitation.
Reports auditory hallucinations in the corridor: “humming,” “breathing,” “the sound of someone remembering me.”
Handwriting analysis inconsistent.
Patient denies authorship of several diary passages, but handwriting patterns match.
Patient appears lucid, though withdrawn, during morning hours.
I have been assigned exclusive documentation duties for this case.
No direct contact permitted until further notice.
Note: Patient signs all personal entries with “K.D.”
No such initials appear on the intake file.
III. CCTV LOG– HALLWAY 3
TIME: 03:13:48
EVENT: Patient stands at door.
Patient listens.
Three seconds of stillness.
TIME: 03:13:51
EVENT: Patient steps back, clutching notebook.
TIME: 03:14:00
EVENT: Camera static (1.7 seconds).
TIME: 03:14:02
EVENT: Patient returns to bed.
No second person detected.
IV. DIARY– 10:45 AM
Someone moved my red scarf again.
Last night: chair.
Today: folded on windowsill, perfectly straight, as if ironed by a ghost with OCD.
Only one person on this floor folds things: the woman in the red scarf.
Her scarf.
Not mine.
She hums those three notes sometimes.
Her face is always blurred. I’ve only seen her reflected in the polished nameplate outside Dr. Amre’s office.
But today, I realized something unsettling: She hums in my rhythm.
My breath.
How does she know my breath?
V. CASE NOTE #02– INTERN: K.D.
Patient attributes personal belongings to nonexistent figures (“the woman in the red scarf”).
Ward staff verify no such scarf in inventory.
Patient is the only resident issued a red scarf as part of chromatic desensitization therapy. Any report of another individual wearing such an item indicates self-attribution distortion.
CCTV confirms patient was alone in the corridor at 10:42 AM.
Recommend updating dissociation evaluation.
Side note (unfiled):
Why does the diary mention a scarf I’ve seen in the footage?
Need to review tonight.
VI. AUDIO LOG TRANSCRIPT– 4:20 PM
[Recording begins abruptly. Static. Someone exhales sharply.]
PATIENT (whispering): She’s here.
[silence]
PATIENT: She’s humming again.
[silence]
PATIENT: She knows I write this. She likes when I…
[Recording ends suddenly. Last 6 seconds corrupted.]
VII. EMAIL DRAFT (UNSENT)– INTERN: K.D. To DR. AMRE
Subject: Urgent Clarification Required
I have reviewed the patient’s audio logs, but the timestamps overlap with my own observation shift. Unless there is a second recorder I’m unaware of, the patient was speaking while I was-
[Draft autosaved. Unsigned.]
VIII. DIARY– 11:07 PM
The humming stopped today.
Replaced by breathing.
Not loud… just close.
I wrote for an hour to stay awake, but the words kept repeating themselves.
Every sentence on the page… twice.
Second version slightly off.
“Today I saw her reflection.”
Repeats as:
“Today she saw my reflection.”
One page is written in the wrong handwriting.
Sharper. Straighter.
Not mine.
Someone else in me has started writing back.
IX. CASE NOTE #05– INTERN: K.D.
Patient reports “mirror interference.”
Describes seeing another person in reflections– specifically with similar posture, gait, and hand shape.
Notably, patient’s descriptions of the figure oscillate between masculine and neutral pronouns. Voice quality reports (“lower humming,” “his breath”) may reflect a masculinized fragment.
Patient claims they “write differently” at night.
Observe for identity diffusion.
Potential emerging fragment.
Personal addendum:
Why does the handwriting from yesterday’s case note…
look like the diary entry I found today?
X. MEMORY RECONSTRUCTION FORM
Q1: Did you meet the Woman today?
(Tick) Yes
(Tick) No
(Tick) Both
COMMENT: “She stood across from me. I felt my breath in her throat.”
Nurse’s remark:
“Patient insisted this was not contradictory.”
XI. DIARY– 2:03 AM
A woman screamed tonight.
Short. Sharp.
Or maybe I dreamt it.
The red scarf was tied around the chair again.
This time, not folded.
Knotted.
Like someone tugged it hard.
When I touched it, I felt two pulses:
mine, and someone else’s, faint beneath it.
Sometimes, I think I am not alone in my body.
Sometimes, I wonder who is waking up when I sleep.
XII. INTERNAL STAFF MEMO– UNSIGNED
Why does the intern’s ID number redirect to the patient’s file?
Why does the system list K.D. as both staff and patient?
Why does the CCTV show the intern walking… alone?
We assume K.D. was part of the off-site rotation, given the remote log submissions. Though no staff member recalls direct interaction.
Forward immediately to IT.
XIII. DIARY– 3:14 AM
The humming again.
Same three notes.
But tonight–
tonight she stepped into the light.
Her scarf was mine.
Her hands were mine.
Her shadow was wrong, too tall, too narrow.
She whispered,
“I have been writing the notes.”
Then disappeared.
XIV. CASE NOTE #11– INTERN: K.D.
Patient shows advanced identity blending. States the intern “visited” at 3:14 AM.
Impossible. I was in the archive room.
Patient may be projecting their internal fragmentation onto hallucinated figures.
Recommend…
[Text trails off. Note ends mid-sentence.]
XV. CCTV REVIEW– REQUESTED BY “K.D.”
TIME: 03:14 AM
Footage shows patient sitting up in bed.
Patient stares at empty doorway.
Patient lifts hand to temple as if saluting.
There is no intern in the footage.
There is no woman.
No scarf.
No second figure.
But the patient’s shadow leans in a different direction than his body.
Impossible angle. Reflection angle discrepancy suggests patient may be perceiving their own movements as belonging to a second figure.
Log forwarded to supervisor.
XVI. LETTER FOUND IN TRASH (UNSIGNED)
To whom it may concern-
I have been observing myself from across the room.
He does not blink when I blink.
He hums before I hear it.
He stands where I should be standing.
I think the intern is stealing my breath.
Or I am stealing his.
Or we are both borrowing from someone neither of us remembers.
XVII. DIARY– 6:32 PM
I tried not to write today.
The silence felt heavier than the words.
Around evening, someone knocked on my door– two taps, then three notes humming.
I opened it before thinking.
The corridor was empty.
But on the floor lay a case note.
Not in my handwriting.
Not dated.
Not signed.
It said:
“Stop writing. You are making us real.”
XVIII. CASE NOTE #14– INTERN: K.D.
Patient reports receiving unauthorized documents.
Claims case note appeared under their door.
Impossible– staff do not slide unofficial notes.
Patient also alleges “someone else” wrote yesterday’s diary entry.
Handwriting matches.
But pressure marks differ.
Observe for nearing breach point– identity collapse probable.
XIX. INCIDENT REPORT
Location: Bathroom mirror
Incident: Patient attempted conversation with reflection.
Witness statement:
“He kept asking his reflection why it kept taking notes.”
Intervention level: Minimal (no aggression, only confusion).
XX. DIARY– LAST ENTRY
I met him tonight.
Not the woman.
Not the shadow.
Not the humming.
Him.
The intern.
He sat across from me.
Same posture.
Same breath.
Same red scarf on his lap.
He smiled… MY smile. But thinner, like it had been borrowed too many times.
“I’ve been documenting your progress.” He said.
I asked, “Who are you?”
“I am what you couldn’t hold together.”
His pupils dilated in a way mine do when I wake up startled.
He leaned close, breath syncing with mine until it felt like one rhythm.
Then he whispered,
“Thank you for writing me.”
The room flickered.
The scarf slipped to the floor… not his side, not mine, but the space between.
When I looked up-
He had my hands.
XXI. FINAL CASE NOTE– DR. V. AMRE
Patient found in a dissociated state, sitting across from an empty chair.
Muttering: “He had my hands.”
‘Intern K.D.’s’ documentation files were discovered merged with the patient’s personal logs.
Cross-referencing reveals identical typing patterns, identical misspellings, and identical metaphor usage.
Conclusion:
Intern K.D. is a self-generated identity created by the patient during fragmentation episodes.
The patient has been documenting themselves.
The intern never existed.
XXII. ADDENDUM (AUTOMATED SYSTEM)
Error: Attempted login from user
K.D.
Access denied.
User does not exist.
XXIII. UNSIGNED NOTE– FOUND IN ARCHIVE BOX
I’m still here.
He still writes.
One of us will stop soon.
I just don’t know which one.
END.
8 responses
It is a wonderful piece of writing and I loved reading it. Congratulations 👏🎉
thankyou so much Divya. Means a lot.
Absolutely stunning!!
nice truly deserving ❤️
Dammnn!! Well deserved Keerthana!!
this is so well thought of! great work
Wow! gave me the spooks in the end! This is a good piece of work, indeed!!
Superb! Loved it and couldn’t stop reading even for a moment. The mystery kept me hooked and the nuances leading to the plot twist were perfectly crafted. Congratulations on winning!